Update: I just noticed that when you hover over the link below and the little Snap Shots popup of the Amazon page appears [a dubious feature I may remove soon], there is a border around the cover image. Go figure.

Look for it at your favorite bookstore. If they don't have it, ask them what in the world they're thinking, not carrying this book. But not in a belligerent way. Or you can find it on Amazon.com. And apparently, it's also available for the Kindle. I've never actually seen a Kindle, but someone out there must have them—they're sold out!

In other news, I had a feature called On This Day Pre-Y2K on this site when the TEAIKI hardcover came out. I stopped maintaining it in May; it was time-consuming, and the material gets rather repetitive after a while. But this past December, as the "pre-Y2K" window approached the Y2K rollover itself, I thought it might be interesting to check in on what some of the "doombrood" were saying immediately prior to the dreaded date—and immediately after, as it became clear that civilization had emerged largely intact. So I added some entries for a few weeks in December 1999 and January 2000. It's not exactly When Prophecy Fails, but you might find it interesting.

In the case of this particular item, however, I was a bit taken aback to see this link.

The product in question: Bags On Board Refill Bags.

UPDATE: We're up to exactly 100 as of 3:21 PM EDT!

Thank you, Time Warner Cable!

A while back, I wrote a Movable Type plugin that automatically keeps track of various versions of blog entries and templates. The coolest feature, loosely adapted from an old Python script by Aaron Swartz, lets you do a "diff" (i.e. "what are the differences?") between two versions, and converts it to a visual display in HTML. (It uses the Perl module Algorithm::Diff for the actual comparison.)

When I was testing this code, I was always looking for examples of slightly different versions of a piece of text. It turns out that the ideal test case for this application is... plagiarism! So I did this not only because it's fun to call out plagiarists but to see how the plugin handled it. There are some oddities, as you'll see (mostly related to punctuation, which the algorithm doesn't quite know how to handle), but by and large, both the plagiarism and the revisions are pretty clear.

Herewith, some pieces of "Education: Ideas worth defending, honesty of reflective thought" as originally written by Jeffrey Hart and lightly revised by Tim Goeglein:

A notable Professor professor of Philosophy philosophy at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College in the last century, Eugene Rosenstock-Hussey often Rosenstock-Hussey, expressed the matter succinctly, succinctly. His wisdom is not only profound but also worth pondering in this new century. He said, "The goal of education," he would say, "is education is to form the Citizen. And the Citizen is a person who, if need be, can re-found his civilization."

He meant that that, I think, in quite large a large sense. He did not mean that you had to master all the specialties you can think of.

He meant that of, but rather to be an educated man or woman, you need needed to be familiar with the large and indispensable components of your — this — our civilization.

This certainly does not mean that you should not study other cultures and civilizations. It does mean that to be a Citizen citizen of this one one, you should be aware of what it is and where it — we — came from.

It can scarcely hardly be challenged that the United States of America is part of the narrative of European history. It owes little or nothing to Confucius or Laotse or to Chief Shaka or to the Aztecs. At the margin it owes a bit to the American Indians, but not a great deal — corn, tobacco, some legendary material. But Europe is overwhelmingly the source. And source, and some parts of Europe more than others: Our language, literature, legal tradition, political arrangements derive, and demonstrably so, demonstrably, from England. This Britain-America connection is central.

There have been many ways of answering the question, "What question: What is Europe?" But a Europe? A handy way to think of the matter is the paradigm of "Athens" and "Jerusalem." In this paradigm, those terms designate both the two cities we have all heard of, and of but also two kinds of mind.

The The tradition designated "Athens" is associated with philosophy and with critical exercise of mind. mind, with reason. The tradition associated with "Jerusalem" is associated with monotheism. monotheism, with faith.

On the side of "Athens" Athens, you will would want to learn something about Homer, who in many ways laid the basis of Greek philosophy, and you will would need to meet Plato, Aristotle, Socrates — the three greatest Greek philosophers — as well as the Greek dramatists, historians, architects and sculptors.

Over in "Jerusalem" Jerusalem, you will would find the epic account of the career of monotheism as it worked its way out in history. The scriptures scriptures, like Homer, have their epic heroes, and, heroes — Moses most dramatically — and like the Greek tradition in some ways ways, they refine and internalize the epic virtues. "Athens" Athens and "Jerusalem" interact Jerusalem, reason and faith, interact, and much flows from this interaction that results in the interaction. fullest expression of the educated man and woman.

You willThe intellectually exciting thing is that with Athens and Jerusalem as the foundations, you would follow all of this down through the centuries, through Virgil and (the great Roman poet), Augustine, and Dante, in Shakespeare, Dante (who is perhaps the greatest poet of Western culture), Shakespeare (who is probably our greatest playwright), Cervantes, and Montaigne, Moliere, Voltaire, Goethe and on to modernity. "The best that has been thought and said," as Matthew Arnold called it. The mind of Europe as T.S. Eliot put it, "from Homer to the present."

Not that I endorse defacing Wikipedia pages, but you have to admit that's funny. (Originally it was "two words"... "I am".)

The Fact Checker column, written by longtime Post reporter Michael Dobbs with the assistance of researcher Alice Crites, applies what it calls "the Pinocchio Test" to statements. Following a sliding scale, the column gives between one and four Pinocchios to untrue statements, with four Pinocchios reserved for "Whoppers."

Right, because the more Pinocchio lied, the more he... um... cloned himself? Shouldn't the units of the scale be "inches of nose" or something?

I hate when people say, “Hey, you’re like Tom Cruise!” I’m nothing like Tom Cruise. That movie has probably done more damage for flair bartenders than anything else. People get this misconception that we’re spilling a lot, because he spills a lot. And the flair he does is actually horrible.

But my favorite part was this:

Until you master the bartending part, until you practice so much that your fingers have bled, I don’t want you to even attempt flair.

And until your fingers have stopped bleeding, I don't want you to mix me a drink.

Anyway, ever since watching a particular Seinfeld episode, I have been unable to listen to any version of that song without hearing the following:

"And you stood out like a ruby in a black manssiere."